People, Planet & Peace
The Massachusetts Affiliate of the Green Party of the United States
Loading



donated 2015-03-15 22:13:35 -0400

Monthly Donation

135 donors
GOAL: 150 DONORS

The Green Rainbow Party is a membership driven organization. Your monthly support allows us to thrive.

Donations to cover ongoing party expenses are cheerfully accepted.  As with all donations to our party, federal law requires that you are 18 or over and either a U.S. citizen or a federally recognized permanent resident. When you become a sustainer, you join others across Massachusetts who recognize the importance of regular and sustained financial contributions to the success of your party, your candidates, and the advancement of your issues. Thank you for your support!


commented on Title: Legislation Working Committee 2014-12-26 15:42:12 -0500 · Flag
Legislative Committee Proposal

The proposal for formation of a legislation committee is most welcome. I’ll try to assemble available platform members to vet this proposal. In the past couple of years Platform Committee has noted that, to fulfill GRP agenda, we need to consider certain changes at state level. But we have not found the capacity to do that research. In addition to the issues mentioned in the proposal, we might also suggest:
  • Revising state income tax to more progressive formula (as recommended by a recent state commission), or perhaps something approaching a guaranteed basic income—supplanting welfare system. To study this, we would need to know where money comes from for what and how it is transferable. (Federal funds likely not transferable.)
  • Equalizing public school education budgets by receiving all local school taxes at the state level and redistributing payment to municipal school districts on a per capita basis, as is the practice in certain other states.
  • Exploring what can be done to end corporate welfare, such as tax expenditures enacted without measures for terminating them.
  • Transferring responsibility for adequate housing construction from the private sector by repealing Chapter 40B and proposing alternative legislation. Examine ways to change funding by quasi public agencies (Mass Development, Mass Housing, etc.) which now favors the interests of builders of market-priced housing and make such funding as they offer available to be controlled at the local level on the basis of sustainable land use policy.

commented on Formation of an Action Working Group 2014-12-26 15:51:34 -0500 · Flag
A further comment: Perhaps the Action Committee could serve as coordinator of programming for local GRP groups (ward committees?), guiding programming which will attract those who share our values, so that these groups may begin to serve the role envisioned as “community uplift assemblies”. Such assemblies might well begin by assessing the needs of residents of their towns and considering how available resources can be marshalled to work at fulfilling those needs, finding a place for everyone. Since GRP is a political organization, such groups should give primary attention to how the local government works with and for local residents. But to establish themselves, they should seek the guidance (and participation) of local non-governmental groups and individuals working to help people meet basic needs. By running programs relevant to GRP values and agenda (and local needs) they can attract more members.

For example, if starting such a group in my town, I might begin by consulting with the Cambridge Tenants Association, headed by a formerly active Green, staff of community centers working with youth, neighborhood associations. I’d try to plan meetings with focus on issues of general interest, but maintain the intention of becoming a community uplift assembly (=a political player in the community) as background to all meetings.

commented on Mass. Carbon Tax and Policy Forum, January 2015 2014-10-01 20:54:30 -0400 · Flag
Would like to comment that what concerns me most is the assumptions of the REMI study. The economic modeling is surely based on standard (i.e. of conventional professional ecomists’) econometric assumptions. Why were variations limited to level of carbon tax imposed rather then how funds received were distributed? Specifically, where the study might have looked at distribution (percentages allocated to reductions in income tax, sales tax, corporate tax—these were not part of the inquiry. The figures were run only on the amount of tax levied. )

Maybe models couldn’t show it, but I would like to know what might happen if carbon taxes were strictly revenue neutral. This, I would assume, would mean that revenue would not be allocated by the government, but returned to taxpayers. Not clear to me whether the modelling of 50% corporate tax reduction fulfills this. Does corporate tax represent 50% of state tax income. There may be other reasons why this is not the best model, however.

Joanna

tagged Nathanael Fortune's Review and Update Main GRP Brochure with Important 2014-01-10 09:09:59 -0500

Review and Update Main GRP Brochure

 

Title: Review and Update Main GRP Brochure

 

Sponsors: Joanna Herlihy and Dru Tarr

 

Shepherd & main sponsor: Joanna Herlihy

 

Committees to be sent to for feedback: Communications, Membership, Platform, CDLC

 

Background: The current main GRP brochure has been used for several years with no changes except in formatting and contact address. Meanwhile, the Green-Rainbow Party has continued to refine its approach to changing circumstances and has adopted a “Party Agenda” as a general guideline. Recently, those working on a document to compare GRP with other parties have formulated some excellent text.

 

Summary: Much of the current brochure should remain intact. The title column, Join the Party, and Yes, I want to support the Party sections are needed. In the other three columns, there might be more concentration on what the Green-Rainbow Party stands for. The existing text describes very well what is dysfunctional about our state government. However, that text might be condensed into less space to leave room for more of what GRP promotes and to suggest applications at the municipal level.

 

Financial Impact: None beyond what is periodically expended in printing brochures.

 

Implementation: The Communications director should invite participation in a working group to review and revise GRP main brochure which represents perspectives of Communications, Membership, Platform, and CDLC committees. This group should review the current brochure and sources which can serve to enrich it, bearing in mind the purposes for which the GRP main brochure is generally used.

 

Proposal: That the GRP Communications Director be requested to invite participation in a working group to review and revise the main GRP brochure,  including representation from communication, membership, platform, and CDLC. This working group should consult several times in the next three months, reviewing pertinent materials, and make recommendations for revisions to be submitted to AdCom for approval by April, 2014.

 

Further, the new approved text of the main GRP brochure should be posted on the green-rainbow.org website in a form that is accessible by member groups such as locals to be printed (in black and white, if need be) for distribution at local occasions.


commented on Winter 2014 agenda 2013-12-15 13:16:25 -0500 · Flag
Could we also review the capacities of the Nationbuilder database to help locals and others to call members and update info? Nationbuilder provides tools for making special purpose lists, sharing the lists with callers, and entering data. The interface has changed since I used these features two years ago. I would urge acquainting everyone with the posiible uses of Nationbuilder dataabasebecause a lot of time is wasted in extracting calling lists from various sources such as Nationbuilder and voter lists, putting them on googledocs.and cross-checking themto avoid wasting caller time and annoying call recipients. New data obtained from calls off such lists doesn’t often get entered in our database.

Donate Online!

491 donors
GOAL: 550 DONORS

Psst: prefer to pay by check? No problem! Just fill in the needed information (including employer and occupation), print out the completed form, and mail it along with your personal check to the Green-Rainbow Party, 232 Highland Ave, Arlington, MA 02476. 

Prefer to schedule a small, automatically renewing monthly or yearly contribution? Please click here.

If the state of our state doesn't feel like paradise to you, and you'd prefer to support a true democratic alternative to today's politics as usual, we'd welcome your contribution in support of voter outreach, candidate support, and day to day party expenses. We're not expecting that you can come up with federal fund limit of $10,000, or even the state fund limit of $500 (but hey, go ahead and surprise us). Instead, please consider what a government that truly worked for us, listened to us, and answered to us would mean to you, how more Green-Rainbow party members in elected office could help bring that about, and then contribute at at level that would be meaningful and significant for you.

Please note: by party policy, we don't accept contributions from state or federal registered lobbyists, no matter what the issue. We want you to be sure that when we speak, we speak for the people of Massachusetts — not for special interests seeking sweetheart deals. Our support comes from you.

Please consider becoming a sustaining donor and make your contribution a monthly event!  click here


tagged Elie Yarden's A Green-Rainbow Party Agenda for Massachusetts with Concerns 2013-01-18 13:02:09 -0500

A Green-Rainbow Party Agenda for Massachusetts

Sponsor: GRP Platform Committee, co-chairs, Brian Cady and Joanna Herlihy

Floor managers: Brian Cady and Joanna Herlihy

Committees sent to for review and feedback: Membership. CDLC, Communications

Background: At the Green-Rainbow State Convention in Worcester on November 17, 2012, delegates reviewed a draft text entitled ‘Fundamental Platform’ and approved a proposal requesting that the Platform Committee continue the development of this document, facilitating broad participation, and that the State Committee discuss and recommend approval of such a document at its January 19, 2013 meeting.

Summary: Given that this document attempts to state a vision for a political action program in Massachusetts for the indefinite future and purports only to serve as a source for political campaign platforms, we hope to avoid confusion by renaming it as an ‘agenda’, rather than a ‘platform’. We welcome any designation that the State Committee considers appropriate for this document. Such an ‘agenda’ can also serve the Green-Rainbow Party as basis for taking positions on contemporary issues.

Financial Impact: No direct impact.

Implementation: If approved, this document will be posted on the Green-Rainbow website, to be used in whatever manner members consider appropriate.

Proposal: Caught between its mandates to solicit and incorporate broad input and to produce a document expressing a coherent vision, the Platform Committee presents to the State Committee for approval the current version of the draft document:at http://grp.kingpine.info/mediawiki/index.php/Fundamental_Platform This document could surely benefit from editorial expertise. On the other hand, the possibility for revision of the party agenda should remain open. We request that that State Committee consider what would be appropriate procedures for improving and updating this document.

1) Preamble

The Green-Rainbow Party (GRP) is the Massachusetts affiliate of the Green Party of the U.S. In 2002, the GRP united (1) the Massachusetts Green Party and the Rainbow Coalition Party on the basis of shared values. The Ten Key Values (2) of the Green-Rainbow Party rest on grassroots democracy, social justice, nonviolence, and ecological wisdom--an understanding of the interconnectedness of everything on Earth, respect for all life and its creativity

The social and environmental crises and dysfunctions of our time are driven by a profit-hungry economic system, governments serving the interests of the few, and false ideas spread by mass media. Unlimited economic growth is not possible on a planet with finite resources. We recognize that it is essential to create a vibrant and sustainable economic system that provides a decent life for all people while maintaining a healthy ecological balance.

The Green-Rainbow Party seeks ways to strengthen and revitalize our communities, the foundation of human society, economy, and democracy. With all empowered to participate, we seek to reclaim and rebuild our economic and political activities to sustain the well-being of people and our planet.

 

2) Proposed Text

I. Healthy Communities

Healthy communities are places where people thrive and find meaning in their lives. Communities where all find a place and a livelihood are more stable and better able to deal with physical and social crises and disasters. Growing income inequality and the continuing transfer of wealth from the less to the more affluent undermine our society and the shared understandings on which it is based. We propose measures to strengthen the vitality of Massachusetts communities, funded with savings from superseded programs and shifts in sources of local and state revenue.

To enable all to participate in their communities, we will prioritize measures to meet basic needs, adding community based programs to the standard safety net. We will act to facilitate local food production and make healthful, affordable food available in all communities, assure adequate and affordable housing for all, and provide universal health care. We will fund services which strengthen communities, including, but not limited to, early childhood education, day care, after-school and outreach programs, adult education, special needs and arts programs.

Residents need opportunities to connect with work that helps their community and its environment, as apprentices, volunteers, or employees at living wages. On the job training, public service projects, and other enterprises with social benefit should be encouraged by government agencies and the private sector, as well as by residents.

We propose to improve public schooling, making sure that all schools are funded to meet the needs of their children, are run democratically, and are staffed with teachers who are able to cultivate in children a sense of autonomy, a spirit of cooperation, critical thinking, empathy, and an appreciation for diversity. Such schooling, free from the influence of private corporate agendas and militarism, should encourage students to develop practical understandings and skills for living in the wider world.

College attendance should not be a requirement for many jobs. State-supported colleges should provide for specialized learning or serve as a platform for professional education. For those who seek it, higher education and research opportunities, as well as professional training, must be made available without incurring debt for tuition.

The criminal justice system must serve community needs, giving priority to prevention and rehabilitation. The Commonwealth must decriminalize possession and use of drugs, treating substance abuse and addiction as public health problems. We must eliminate mandatory sentencing, and reduce use of incarceration as punishment. Correctional facilities must protect rights of prisoners and their families and must not be run for profit.

The proposed social advances are intended for the benefit of everyone living in the Commonwealth, without discrimination on the basis of sex, color, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, language, immigration status, criminal record, religion, belief system or political orientation.

The Massachusetts tax system must be revised to make it truly progressive, relieving the burden on people who are experiencing financial difficulties. This should be done at both state and local levels. Government revenue should eventually shift from taxes on incomes to taxes on profits, land and resource use, excessive consumption, and environmental pollution. This should enable development of universal minimum income (3) to allow democratic participation for all.

II. Sustainable Economies

Economies are systems developed by ordinary people working together to meet their needs. Ecologically sound economies conserve and recycle natural resources and fully involve human capabilities and imagination and are responsible to the future of humanity. The prevailing global "economic" system, controlled by the powerful, is wasteful, predatory, and destabilizing. Accepting this model, Massachusetts has failed many sectors of its population and permitted widespread degradation of its land, water, air, and ecosystems. We will strengthen local and regional economies, encouraging sustainable enterprises that are rooted in and responsible to their communities, while promoting regional and trans-regional collaboration.

The Commonwealth must establish and maintain programs and take measures to assist conversion to ecologically sound, locally and democratically controlled economies based on a mix of enterprises--cooperative, public, and private. The Commonwealth as a whole and individual towns should organize employment in projects beneficial to communities and their environments, providiing training, experience, and wages. Such programs should provide employment opportunities to all through democratically managed job banks.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts was formed to work for the common good. To protect the commons, including land, water, air, and ecosystems, in the face of catastrophic threats posed by accelerating climate change, the Commonwealth must aggressively promote the transition to local, sustainable economies. Such economies are based on energy conservation and efficiency, distributed clean energy production, local organic agriculture, and public transportation with safe walking and bike paths between transportation hubs. Towards this end, we must generously fund environmental research, programs, and education, as well as regional planning and public transportation. The highest standards for environmental and public health protection must be applied to new and old technologies. Reducing use of energy from fossil fuels and developing alternative energy sources need persistent attention and funding.

Wage labor in the Commonwealth must be compensated with living wages adequate for a worker and dependents to afford basic housing, food, and healthcare, laying the ground for reduced working hours and job sharing. Rights of workers to organize, for safety in the workplace, and for collective bargaining must be protected. Rights of whistleblowers to share information about things that endanger society, in both private and public enterprise, must be supported

The Commonwealth must assume more responsibility in the operation of enterprises serving the general public, such as communications, utilities, and transportation networks. Government ownership, state or municipal, should be enabled when indicated by the public benefit. Where the ownership of enterprises is held by individuals, varieties of cooperative, democratic, and non-profit ownership should be strongly encouraged by law and policy.

The legislature must create a transparently and democratically run state bank to provide financial support for local sustainable economies and enterprises. A state bank would also lessen the massive transfer of wealth to the elite that controls the privately owned banking corporations. Legislation must also enable municipal level public banks. Such institutions can fund needed investments in community and ecosystems, greatly reducing the price of public projects by eliminating near-crippling costs on interest for loans from private banks. A state-owned bank can also support local private banking. The people benefit when funds are retained locally. Local currencies, time banks, and barter systems will also reduce dependence on the dominant monetary economy.

The Commonwealth should regularly review corporate charters and exercise its powers to assure that they act in the interest of all, not causing harm to workers, communities, the environment. or democracy in Massachusetts or world-wide. Municipalities should exercise their powers to the same end. For all the reasons described by Thomas Jefferson centuries ago, corporations and other artificial entities should not be given constitutional rights. These are reserved for individual human beings. Toward that end, our congressional delegation should be instructed to support a Constitutional amendment to clarify that corporations are not people and that money is not speech.

International treaties negotiated by the federal government can affect the economy of Massachusetts adversely. The Commonwealth's International Trade Commission must advise the state about the harmful effects of such trade treaties, which may override labor and environmental protection. The Commonwealth should challenge the legality of harmful treaties and advise our Congressional delegation accordingly, opposing all corporate activity which is not accountable to the people or the planet. The Commonwealth must not enter into contracts with suppliers who engage in human rights violations or participate in war.

III. Democratic Governance

Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity and happiness of the people; and not for the profit, honor, or private interest of any one individual, family, or class: Therefore the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity and happiness require it. (4) (Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Article VII) The Green-Rainbow Party proposes to remedy the failure to follow through on the stated premise of commonwealth government over the past two hundred years through a variety of measures, as follows:

The Commonwealth must protect the civil liberties of all residents, whatever their legal status. People require ready access to accurate information and the opportunity to assemble in public spaces and to exchange opinions. Voting rights must be guaranteed to all citizens. The integrity of voter choice must be respected; it is best assured by a paper trail for ballots and careful auditing of election results by nonpartisan officers.

Representative government requires that candidates for elected office have reasonable access to the ballot and to public information media for both state and local elections. We work towards voter rights for residents, state financing of candidacy for public office, election by majority (not plurality), and preferential/ranked choice for all candidates in primary and general elections. In a bicameral legislature, it should be possible to represent both the interests of local communities and also the broad range of opinions on conduct of state-wide affairs. Political diversity in the Commonwealth as a whole should be represented in its legislative bodies. Compact districts of roughly equal population should be drawn on the basis of shared concerns of these populations.

Democratic deliberation and decision making must be carried out as close to the people concerned as possible, and conducted in a manner which assures that all perspectives are considered. Citizen assemblies, chosen openly and freely by those most directly involved in outcomes, should be given appropriate powers in coordination with state and municipal governments. Planning, participatory budgeting, and economic development councils should be open to all affected sectors of society, and the findings of these groups must be legally and fiscally binding. Commonwealth law on 'home rule' (5) must be revisited to ensure adherence to the principle of subsidiarity.

It may at times be necessary for the Commonwealth to contest federal laws and policies that are or may be damaging to the common good. It is a duty of all government officials to call attention to such cases. Our Congressional delegation should be instructed to support downsizing of the bloated military budget and redirecting funds to support real security through meeting critical needs here at home.

Transparency in government operations relies on open hearings, legislative procedures that can be followed by the public, open reporting of legislative actions, and easy access to records. Financial records must be publicly available in spreadsheet format to allow for analysis by citizens. Contracts must be structured to assure competition to take advantage of innovation and efficiency. Continuous auditing of government expenditures will enable critical scrutiny, reducing waste and providing data for improvements. Instituting full cost accounting will assist decision-making by indicating long term effects on the environment and the people. Liability accounting should include future liabilities caused by land use policy and law. The ability to adapt to rapidly changing reality will determine the success of governments and the survival of the people who institute them.

~ END ~

Notes:

1)http://green-rainbow.org/platform_committee

2)http://green-rainbow.org/10_key_values

3)http://www.gp.org/committees/platform/2012/economic-justice-and-sustainability.php#LivableIncome

4)Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Article 7

5)see Wikipedia



Alternative Preamble

The Green-Rainbow Party (GRP) is the Massachusetts affiliate of the Green Party of the U.S. In 2002, the GRP united the Massachusetts Green Party and the Rainbow Coalition Party on the basis of their shared values and aspirations.

Our Ten Key Values rest on understanding the interconnectedness of people, planet, and peace. We emphasize the ability of human beings to work together because they recognize their sustaining role within the diversity and complexity of healthy living systems and robust human societies, without which peace is impossible.

Massachusetts, like much of politics today, takes interdependent social and ecological systems and splinters them into scattered and contentious issues. In contrast, the GRP sees the various crises of our times -- in human rights, the environment, the economy, and electoral politics -- as the result of the unending excesses of corporate capitalism and greed which threaten democracy by dominating our political systems and mass media.

As we map out a plan of action, we do not expect our government to do for us what we can and want to do ourselves. But neither will we allow our government to desert us as we struggle against unequal conditions that we cannot control on our own. In the world’s richest -- yet least taxed -- industrial country, we should not be made to fight each other for crumbs, while global corporations and the most wealthy among us fill their pockets.

To counter the exploitation of people and the planet, the GRP seeks to strengthen and revitalize our communities so every person can be a creative contributor, have a decent life, and be free from fear, discrimination, and hopelessness. To that end, we seek to reclaim and rework the economic and political activities of our Commonwealth.

 


donated 2012-09-14 12:00:00 -0400

Candidates Fund

$1,105.00 raised
GOAL: $3,000.00

Dear supporter, 

Green-Rainbow Party candidates for public office rely solely on support from our party and from individuals like you. As a matter of principle and practice, they never accept donations from SuperPACs or professional lobbyists.  In recent years, our party has made financial contributions (in amounts ranging from $100 to $1500) to support Green-Rainbow candidates who were running campaigns for offices at all levels

To maintain this ability to foster the Green-Rainbow Party's most promising candidates races where they have a chance to make a difference, our party needs to constantly replenish its Candidate Fund, along with general operational funds to cover the costs of printed materials, voter databases, websites, and meeting room rental fees.   Your contribution to the Green-Rainbow Party Candidate Fund will help to launch and sustain campaigns for responsible, compassionate government, and will promote the injection of our Ten Key Values into the realm of American political discourse, where they are so desperately needed. Thank you!


Foreclosure Bill in Home Stretch - Final Call for Calls

A Conference Committee is looking at Foreclosure Legislation this week. Please ask your representative to do two things:

1.   Sign-on to the dear colleague letter that Representative O’Day and 15 other legislators have sent to your office.
2.   Speak to the Foreclosure Conference Committee and the Speaker of the House: Tell them you support:
·         The Senate’s Mandatory Mediation: All the other New England states have this and it works!
·         The provisions for
o  Transparency so Homeowners can understand the new procedures and obligations
o  Consistency with proven Federal Standards
o  Preserving Homeowner Rights
·         The Preventing Unnecessary Vacancies Taskforce to negotiate language to allow homeowners to rent after foreclosure.

2nd call, please call the Speaker Deleo (Leader of the House) at 617-722-2500
3rd call, please call Representative Costello, house chair of Financial Services who is leading up this bill, at 617-722-2220

Fact sheet from MAAPL follows.
PS. If you don't know who your State Representative is, go to wheredoivotema.com, enter your address, when the screen comes down, scroll down to "general court" and find your representative's name there.

Then you can call the switchboard at 617-722-2000, press 2 the 0 and ask to be transferred to your representative's office


Strengthened Foreclosure Bill Passes MA Senate

joanna.jpgNEW ROAD, a network of bank tenant associations, together with MAAPL, the Mass Alliance Against Predatory Lending, won important new protections in the MA Senate foreclosure bill passed yesterday. These included mandatory mediation and some important technical fixes in the foreclosure bill. An important priority, eviction protection for homeowners, is still alive.

We have more work to do now, to make sure the House adopts the Senate version and to make sure the homeowner protection comes up for a vote.

Thank you all for your phone calls and support!!

 


Anti-Foreclosure Bill Moves to MA Senate - Needs Teeth

The foreclosure bill adopted by the Massachusetts House as H4096, lacking Mandatory Mediation and Preventing Unnecessary Vacancies (allowing former homeowners to continue as rental tenants) was referred to the Senate Ways and Means Committee.  Senate version may be voted next week, so immediate calls to state senators are urgent.

The basic message is:
• We need Mandatory Mediation and Preventing Unnecessary Vacancies (allowing former homeowners to rent while the bank owns the property) as a bill or an amendment!
• We need the Attorney General's standard for all loans AND as part of Mandatory Mediation so that homeowners can start using it before foreclosure to help get a sustainable loan modification.
• We need some fixes to the version of the Attorney General's bill they have so it is not more burdensome for homeowners than the present laws!


Anti-Foreclosure Bill at Risk of Losing Teeth - Please Call Your Rep

The Massachusetts Joint Committee on Financial Services has approved text for an omnibus bill on foreclosures (H1219) which lacks critical provisions recommended by lawyers who deal with victims of predatory lending. Mandatory mediation (S673/H1355) and preventing unnecessary vacancies (S767/H493), do not appear in the new text:
http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/23452531/2018939992/name/H%2E1219_35B_Redraft%20%28clean%29%2Edoc


commented on To Boldly Go Beyond Coal in Holyoke 2012-02-18 22:40:30 -0500 · Flag
Thanks for this, Rick. Will you keep us posted on how the Community Advisory process is going? How does it mesh with Action for Healthy Holyoke? Is it limited to 12 members? If so, sounds as though there isn’t room for CLF, Toxics Action and Sierra Club people. Are they serving as advisors?

For some reason, I had thought that hydro power was very important in Holyoke. Was that 100 years ago?

commented on Why we need an expanded Medicare For All 2012-02-12 13:42:07 -0500 · Flag
Good idea!